2025 customs data shows a 37% year-on-year surge in import dispute cases for equipment, with 65% stemming from ambiguous agency clauses. OneMedical Equipmentimporter suffered three months of port detention for an 8-million-yuan CT device due to undefined installation responsibilities, incurring direct losses exceeding 1 million yuan. This painful lesson warns us: professional clause design is the first line of defense against import risks.
Six core clauses that must be locked down
1. Precise delineation of agency scope
Equipment parameter description methods:
Wrong example: "German-made testing equipment",
Correct writing: "M-brand 2025 model X-ray diffractometer (Model: XD-2025Pro)",
Service boundary division:
Clearly specify whether it includes3CCertification Handling
Designate China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission
Specify 60-working-day mandatory negotiation period
4. Special intellectual property provisions
Require sellers to provide patent validity proof
Embed infringement liability transfer clauses
Software licenses require separate LICENSE agreements
Modern interpretation of force majeure clauses
Special attention required in 2025:
Include chip shortages in force majeure scope
Latest interpretation of international shipping controls
Set 30-day impact duration上限
5. Penetrative effect of confidentiality clauses
Technical parameter保密期 no less than 5 years
Extend約束對象 to upstream/downstream suppliers
Adopt違約賠償 usingAgreed loss calculation methods
Three verification steps for clause implementation
1. Reverse verification: Simulate equipment報(bào)廢 scenarios to test賠償條款 operability
2. Timeline deduction: Map interlinkage timelines for all stages
3. Seal document review: Verify power of attorney against signing authority
A certainphotovoltaicEquipment import cases show professional clause review helped enterprises recover 3.2 million yuan in potential losses. When you grasp these six legal keys,Import Representationrisk doors will become truly controllable.